Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison by multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis and antimicrobial resistance among atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from food samples and human and animal faecal specimens.
Wang, L; Nakamura, H; Kage-Nakadai, E; Hara-Kudo, Y; Nishikawa, Y.
Afiliação
  • Wang L; School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
  • Nakamura H; Graduate School of Human Life Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kage-Nakadai E; Department of Microbiology, Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
  • Hara-Kudo Y; Graduate School of Human Life Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Nishikawa Y; The OCU Advanced Research Institute for Natural Science and Technology, Osaka City University, Graduate School of Human Life Science, Osaka, Japan.
J Appl Microbiol ; 122(1): 268-278, 2017 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27718315
AIM: This study assessed whether multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing discriminated diarrhoeagenic atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (aEPEC) from aEPEC indigenous to domestic animals or healthy people. METHODS AND RESULTS: MLVA genotyping of 142 aEPEC strains isolated from foods and faecal samples of domestic animals and humans revealed 126 distinct MLVA profiles that distributed to four clusters, yielding a Simpson's index of diversity (D) of 99·8%. Cluster 2 included 87% of cattle isolates and 67% of patient isolates. The plurality (15/34, 44%) of strains from healthy humans mapped to Cluster 1, while half (18/41, 44%) of the swine strains belonged to Cluster 4. Testing for antimicrobial susceptibility revealed that 52 strains (37%) of aEPEC were resistant to one or more agents; only 10 strains (7%) exhibited resistance to more than three agents. Strains isolated from swine or food exhibited a wider variety of resistance phenotypes than bovine or human strains. CONCLUSIONS: MLVA assigned the aEPEC isolates from cattle and patients to Cluster 2, distinct from aEPEC from other sources. Hog yards may be a larger source of drug-resistant strains than are cattle ranches. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: MLVA suggests that human diarrhoeagenic aEPEC are derived from cattle and are distinct from strains carried by healthy people and other animals. Cattle appear to be reservoirs of human diarrhoeagenic aEPEC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Escherichia coli / Escherichia coli Enteropatogênica / Fezes / Microbiologia de Alimentos / Antibacterianos Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Microbiol Assunto da revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por Escherichia coli / Escherichia coli Enteropatogênica / Fezes / Microbiologia de Alimentos / Antibacterianos Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Microbiol Assunto da revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China