Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.
Dossett, Lesly A; Hudson, Janella N; Morris, Arden M; Lee, M Catherine; Roetzheim, Richard G; Fetters, Michael D; Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
Afiliação
  • Dossett LA; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Hudson JN; Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
  • Morris AM; Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Lee MC; Associate Member, Comprehensive Breast Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
  • Roetzheim RG; Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.
  • Fetters MD; Senior Member, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior and Comprehensive Breast Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
  • Quinn GP; Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 67(2): 156-169, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27727446
ABSTRACT
Although they are critical to models of coordinated care, the relationship and communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialists throughout the cancer continuum are poorly understood. By using predefined search terms, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature in 3 databases to examine the relationship and communication between PCPs and cancer specialists. Among 301 articles identified, 35 met all inclusion criteria and were reviewed in-depth. Findings from qualitative, quantitative, and disaggregated mixed-methods studies were integrated using meta-synthesis. Six themes were identified and incorporated into a preliminary conceptual model of the PCP-cancer specialist relationship 1) poor and delayed communication between PCPs and cancer specialists, 2) cancer specialists' endorsement of a specialist-based model of care, 3) PCPs' belief that they play an important role in the cancer continuum, 4) PCPs' willingness to participate in the cancer continuum, 5) cancer specialists' and PCPs' uncertainty regarding the PCP's oncology knowledge/experience, and 6) discrepancies between PCPs and cancer specialists regarding roles. These data indicate a pervasive need for improved communication, delineation, and coordination of responsibilities between PCPs and cancer specialists. Future interventions aimed at these deficiencies may improve patient and physician satisfaction and cancer care coordination. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67156-169. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Relações Interprofissionais / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: CA Cancer J Clin Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Relações Interprofissionais / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: CA Cancer J Clin Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article