Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Melanomas vs. nevi in high-risk patients under long-term monitoring with digital dermatoscopy: do melanomas and nevi already differ at baseline?
Tschandl, P; Hofmann, L; Fink, C; Kittler, H; Haenssle, H A.
Afiliação
  • Tschandl P; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hofmann L; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
  • Fink C; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kittler H; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Haenssle HA; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(6): 972-977, 2017 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896853
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

What lesions to select for a most efficient dermatoscopic monitoring of patients with multiple nevi remains an unresolved issue.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the grade of atypia of melanomas and nevi of the same patient at baseline.

METHODS:

Prospective observational study using 236 dermatoscopic baseline images (59 quartets from 59 patients, each including one melanoma detected during follow-up and three nevi). Dermatologists (n = 26) were asked to assess the 'grade of dermatoscopic atypia' on a numerical scale and to identify the melanomas.

RESULTS:

On average, each dermatologist identified 24 of 59 melanomas (40%, range 11-37). The number of correct picks was greater for dermatologists with moderate (mean 28) or high (mean 28) experience compared to beginners (mean 17; P < 0.001). In three of the 59 sets, none of the 26 dermatologists identified the melanoma. The mean grade of dermatoscopic atypia was 2.5 for nevi (95% CI 2.4-2.6) and 3.0 for melanomas (95% CI 2.9-3.1, P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS:

Rating dermatologists were informed that each quartet of images included one melanoma creating substantial deviation from a real-life situation.

CONCLUSION:

A significant proportion of melanomas detected during follow-up cannot be differentiated from nevi at baseline. This necessitates the additional inclusion of less atypical lesions for monitoring.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermoscopia / Melanoma / Monitorização Fisiológica / Nevo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA / DOENCAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermoscopia / Melanoma / Monitorização Fisiológica / Nevo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA / DOENCAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria