Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in the Force-Velocity Mechanical Profile After Short Resistance Training Programs Differing in Set Configurations.
Iglesias-Soler, Eliseo; Fernández-Del-Olmo, Miguel; Mayo, Xián; Fariñas, Juan; Río-Rodríguez, Dan; Carballeira, Eduardo; Carnero, Elvis A; Standley, Robert A; Giráldez-García, Manuel A; Dopico-Calvo, Xurxo; Tuimil, Jose Luis.
Afiliação
  • Iglesias-Soler E; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Fernández-Del-Olmo M; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Mayo X; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Fariñas J; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Río-Rodríguez D; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Carballeira E; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Carnero EA; 2 Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes, Florida Hospital.
  • Standley RA; 2 Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes, Florida Hospital.
  • Giráldez-García MA; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Dopico-Calvo X; 1 University of A Coruna.
  • Tuimil JL; 1 University of A Coruna.
J Appl Biomech ; 33(2): 144-152, 2017 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27918682
ABSTRACT
The main aim of this study was to analyze the effect of resistance training programs differing in set configuration on mechanical force-velocity profiles. Thirteen participants performed 10 unilateral knee extension training sessions over 5 weeks. Each limb was randomized to one of the following set configurations traditional (4 sets of 8 repetitions at maximum intended velocity, 10RM load, 3-min pause between sets) or interrepetition rest (32 maximum intended velocity repetitions, 10RM load, 17.4 s of rest between each repetition). Velocity of each repetition was recorded throughout the program. Before and after training, individual linear force velocities were calculated, and the following parameters were obtained force and velocity axis intercept, slope, and estimated maximum power. Mean velocity was higher throughout the program for interrepetition rest configuration (0.54 ± 0.01 vs. 0.48 ± 0.01 m∙s-1 for interrepetition rest, and traditional configuration respectively; main effect of set configuration P < .001). There was a significant increase in force and velocity intercepts, but a steeper negative slope after both training protocols (main effect of time P < .001 for every variable). Differences in resistance training velocity did not affect the adaptations. Our results suggest that, in a short-term program, maximum intended rather than actual velocity is a key factor to modulate strength adaptations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adaptação Fisiológica / Aptidão Física / Músculo Esquelético / Treinamento Resistido / Movimento / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Biomech Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adaptação Fisiológica / Aptidão Física / Músculo Esquelético / Treinamento Resistido / Movimento / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Biomech Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article