Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of Inpatient Cost Per Day in General Surgery Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal-Bolus versus Sliding Scale Insulin Regimens.
Phillips, Victoria L; Byrd, Anwar L; Adeel, Saira; Peng, Limin; Smiley, Dawn D; Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
Afiliação
  • Phillips VL; Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
  • Byrd AL; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Adeel S; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Peng L; Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Smiley DD; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Umpierrez GE; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 1(2): 109-115, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660256
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The identification of cost-effective glycaemic management strategies is critical to hospitals. Treatment with a basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen has been shown to result in better glycaemic control and fewer complications than sliding scale regular insulin (SSI) in general surgery patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the effect on costs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE:

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the RABBIT Surgery trial to examine whether total inpatient costs per day for general surgery patients with T2DM treated with BBI (n = 103) differed from those for patients with T2DM treated with SSI (n = 99) regimens.

METHODS:

Data were collected from patient clinical and hospital billing records. Charges were adjusted to reflect hospital costs. General linearized models were used to estimate the risk-adjusted effects of BBI versus SSI treatment on average total inpatient costs per day.

RESULTS:

Risk-adjusted average total inpatient costs per day were $US5404. Treatment with BBI compared with SSI reduced average total inpatient costs per day by $US751 (14%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 20-4). Being treated in a university medical centre, being African American or having a bowel procedure or higher-volume pharmacy use significantly reduced costs per day.

CONCLUSIONS:

In general surgery patients with T2DM, a BBI regimen significantly reduced average total hospital costs per day compared with an SSI regimen. BBI has been shown to improve outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. Those results, combined with our findings regarding savings, suggest that hospitals should consider adopting BBI regimens in patients with T2DM undergoing surgery.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article