Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing residents' knowledge of patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study at a large academic medical centre.
Stewart, Diana E; Dang, Bich N; Trautner, Barbara; Cai, Cecilia; Torres, Sergio; Turner, Teri.
Afiliação
  • Stewart DE; Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Dang BN; Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Trautner B; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Cai C; Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Torres S; Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Disease, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Turner T; VA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Houston VA, Houston, Texas, USA.
BMJ Open ; 7(8): e017100, 2017 Aug 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28827266
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Patient satisfaction impacts healthcare quality and outcomes. Residents play an important role in patient satisfaction at academic institutions. This study aims to assess residents' patient satisfaction knowledge and determine which learning experiences contributed to their knowledge acquisition. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a health science university in a large, urban, tertiary-care academic medical centre in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS:

All residents from internal medicine (n=185) and paediatrics (n=156) were asked to participate.

DESIGN:

Residents completed a survey from April 2013 to December 2013 that assessed (1) knowledge of factors that impact patient satisfaction and (2) learning experiences that may have contributed to their understanding of the drivers of patient satisfaction (eg, experiential (personal or clinical) or didactics). Trainees identified the importance of factors in determining patient satisfaction on a five-point Likert scale; answers were compiled into a knowledge score. The score was correlated with prior personal/clinical experience and didactics.

RESULTS:

Of the 341 residents, 247 (72%) completed the survey. No difference was found in knowledge among training levels or residency programme. More than 50% incorrectly thought physician board certification, patient's education, patient's income and physician's age impacted satisfaction. Personal experience, through hospitalisation of a relative or friend, was correlated with higher knowledge (67% vs 71%, p=0.03). Ninety-nine per cent (n=238) stated peer observation, and all stated faculty feedback impacted their patient satisfaction knowledge. Seventy-seven per cent (n=185) had attended didactics on satisfaction, but attendance did not correlate with higher scores.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study showed trainees have a few gaps in their patient satisfaction knowledge, and attending past educational sessions on patient satisfaction did not correlate with higher knowledge scores. Our data suggest that academic centres should leverage residents' personal experiences, their observations of peers and faculty feedback to enhance patient satisfaction knowledge.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Satisfação do Paciente / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Satisfação do Paciente / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos