Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Brain's Reward Response Occurs Even Without Actual Reward!
Fielding, A; Fu, Y; Franz, E A.
Afiliação
  • Fielding A; Action Brain and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Level 4, William James Building, 275 Leith Walk, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.
  • Fu Y; Action Brain and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Level 4, William James Building, 275 Leith Walk, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.
  • Franz EA; Action Brain and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Level 4, William James Building, 275 Leith Walk, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand. lfranz@psy.otago.ac.nz.
J Gambl Stud ; 34(2): 449-463, 2018 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29027071
ABSTRACT
What if the brain's response to reward occurs even when there is no reward? Wouldn't that be a further concern for people prone to problem gambling and other forms of addiction, like those related to eating? Electroencephalography was employed to investigate this possibility using probabilistic feedback manipulations and measures of known event-related potentials (ERPs) related to reward processing. We tested the hypothesis-that reward-based ERPs would occur even in the absence of a tangible reward and when manipulations on expectation are implicit. The well-known P300 response potential was a key focus, and was assessed in non-gambling volunteer undergraduates on a task involving experimentally-manipulated probabilities of positive or negative feedback comprising three trial types-80, 50, or 20% positive feedback. A feedback stimulus (F1) followed a guess response between two possible outcomes (implicit win/loss), and then a second feedback stimulus (F2) was presented to confirm an alleged 'win' or 'loss' (explicit win/loss). Results revealed that amplitude of the P300 in F1-locked data (implicit manipulation) was larger (more positive) on average for feedback outcomes that were manipulated to be less likely than expected. The effect is pronounced after increased time on task (later trials), even though the majority of participants were not explicitly aware of our probability manipulations. For the explicit effects in F2-locked data, no meaningful or significant effects were observed. These findings point to the existence of proposed success-response mechanisms that operate not only explicitly but also with implicit manipulations that do not involve any direct indication of a win or loss, and are not associated with tangible rewards. Thus, there seems to be a non-explicit form of perception (we call 'implicit') associated with an internal experience of wins/losses (in the absence of actual rewards or losses) that can be measured in associated brain processes. The potential significance of these findings is discussed in terms of implications for problem gambling.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Encéfalo / Comportamento Aditivo / Jogo de Azar Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Gambl Stud Assunto da revista: PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Recompensa / Encéfalo / Comportamento Aditivo / Jogo de Azar Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Gambl Stud Assunto da revista: PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia