Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers and facilitators to implementing the commission on cancer's distress screening program standard.
Knies, Andrea K; Jutagir, Devika R; Ercolano, Elizabeth; Pasacreta, Nicholas; Lazenby, Mark; McCorkle, Ruth.
Afiliação
  • Knies AK; Yale University School of Nursing,West Haven,CT.
  • Jutagir DR; Yale University School of Medicine,New Haven,CT.
  • Ercolano E; Yale University School of Nursing,West Haven,CT.
  • Pasacreta N; Yale University School of Nursing,West Haven,CT.
  • Lazenby M; Yale University School of Nursing,West Haven,CT.
  • McCorkle R; Yale University School of Nursing,West Haven,CT.
Palliat Support Care ; 17(3): 253-261, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880068
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Many cancer centers struggle to implement standardized distress screening despite the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer 2012 mandate for a distress screening program standard of care by 2015. This paper presents outcomes for the first cohort of participants (n = 36) of a Screening for Psychosocial Distress Program (SPDP), a 2-year training program designed to assist clinicians in implementing routine distress screening as mandated by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Specifically, participants' success with distress screening implementation, institutional barriers and facilitators to implementation, and the role of the SPDP are described.

METHOD:

This research followed a longitudinal pre- and posttest mixed methods design. An investigator-developed questionnaire collected qualitative (distress screening goals, institutional barriers and facilitators, facilitators associated with participation in the SPDP) and quantitative (level of goal achievement) data at 6, 12, and 24 months of participation in the SPDP. Conventional content analysis was applied to qualitative data. Mixed methods data analysis in Dedoose evaluated (1) types and number of distress screening goals, barriers, and facilitators, and (2) goal achievement at 6, 12, and 24 months of participation.ResultNinety-five percent of distress screening implementation goals were completed after 2 years of participation. Most common institutional barriers to distress screening implementation were "lack of staff," "competing demands," and "staff turn-over." Most common institutional facilitators were "buy-in," "institutional support," and "recognition of participants' expertise." The number of reported facilitators associated with SPDP participation was higher than the number associated with any institutional factor, and increased over time of participation.Significance of resultsParticipating in training programs to implement distress screening may facilitate successful achievement of the Commission on Cancer's distress screening standard, and benefits seem to increase with time of participation. Training programs are needed to promote facilitators and overcome barriers to distress screening.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Programas de Rastreamento / Angústia Psicológica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Palliat Support Care Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Programas de Rastreamento / Angústia Psicológica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Palliat Support Care Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article