Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Propofol Attenuates the Myocardial Protection Properties of Desflurane by Modulating Mitochondrial Permeability Transition.
Heiberg, Johan; Royse, Colin F; Royse, Alistair G; Andrews, David T.
Afiliação
  • Heiberg J; From the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Royse CF; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Royse AG; From the Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Andrews DT; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anesth Analg ; 127(2): 387-397, 2018 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29933271
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Desflurane and propofol are cardioprotective, but relative efficacy is unclear. The aim was to compare myocardial protection of single, simultaneous, and serial administration of desflurane and propofol.

METHODS:

Sixty New Zealand White rabbits and 65 isolated Sprague Dawley rat hearts randomly received desflurane, propofol, simultaneous desflurane and propofol, or sequential desflurane then propofol. Rabbits were subdivided to receive either ischemia-reperfusion with temporary occlusion of the left anterior descending artery or a time-matched, nonischemic perfusion protocol, whereas rat hearts were perfused in a Langendorff model with global ischemia-reperfusion. End points were hemodynamic, functional recovery, and mitochondrial uptake of H-2-deoxy-D-glucose as an indicator of mitochondrial permeability transition.

RESULTS:

In rabbits, there were minimal increases in preload-recruitable stroke-work with propofol (P < .001), desflurane (P < .001), and desflurane-and-propofol (P < .001) groups, but no evidence of increases with pentobarbitone (P = .576) and desflurane-then-propofol (P = .374). In terms of end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, there was no evidence of increase compared to nonischemic controls with desflurane-then-propofol (P = .364), a small but significant increase with desflurane (P < .001), and larger increases with pentobarbitone (P < .001), propofol (P < .001), and desflurane-and-propofol (P < .001).In rat hearts, there was no statistically significant difference in mitochondrial H-activity between propofol and desflurane-and-propofol (165 ± 51 × 10 vs 154 ± 51 × 10 g·mL·min/µmol; P = .998). Desflurane had lower uptake than propofol (65 ± 21 × 10 vs 165 ± 51 × 10 g·mL·min/µmol; P = .039), but there was no statistically significant difference between desflurane and desflurane-then-propofol (65 ± 21 × 10 vs 59 ± 11 × 10 g·mL·min/µmol; P = .999).

CONCLUSIONS:

Propofol and desflurane are cardioprotective, but desflurane is more effective than propofol. The added benefit of desflurane is lost when used simultaneously with propofol.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Desflurano / Mitocôndrias / Miocárdio Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Desflurano / Mitocôndrias / Miocárdio Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália