Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Medical Therapy Improve SinoNasal Outcomes Test-22 Domain Scores? An Analysis of Clinically Important Differences.
Chowdhury, Naweed I; Mace, Jess C; Bodner, Todd E; Alt, Jeremiah A; Deconde, Adam S; Levy, Joshua M; Smith, Timothy L.
Afiliação
  • Chowdhury NI; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Mace JC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Bodner TE; Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
  • Alt JA; Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Deconde AS; Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
  • Levy JM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.
  • Smith TL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Laryngoscope ; 129(1): 31-36, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30208209
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the 22-item SinoNasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) electing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are well described. However, similar estimations for the MCID have not been investigated for patients electing continued appropriate medical therapy (CAMT). We sought to determine MCID values for a medically treated CRS cohort and compare them to historical MCIDs associated with ESS. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with refractory CRS electing CAMT were prospectively enrolled from academic referral clinics into an observational cohort study. Baseline and posttreatment SNOT-22 survey responses were collected. Four distribution-based methods for calculating MCIDs (e.g., half-standard deviation, Cohen's d, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change) were used to identify a range of MCID values for SNOT-22 total and domain scores. RESULTS: The average MCID value for SNOT-22 total scores was 8.0, whereas mean MCID values for rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, ear/facial, psychological, and sleep symptom domain scores were 3.9, 2.5, 3.3, 3.4, and 2.9, respectively, comparable to previously reported values for patients electing ESS. Although change in SNOT-22 total scores following CAMT exceeded the MCID, none of the average SNOT-22 domain score improvements surpassed their respective MCID thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: MCID values for SNOT-22 total and domain scores in patients electing CAMT are similar to previously published MCID values associated with ESS, indicating that MCID values are independent of treatment modality selection. Therefore, despite evidence of statistical significance, CAMT for CRS may not be associated with clinically discernable improvements in average SNOT-22 domain scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 129:31-36, 2019.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Sinusite / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Rinite / Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Sinusite / Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Rinite / Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article