Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI-Based Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Predicting Pathologic Response of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Amodeo, Salvatore; Rosman, Alan S; Desiato, Vincenzo; Hindman, Nicole M; Newman, Elliot; Berman, Russell; Pachter, H Leon; Melis, Marcovalerio.
Afiliação
  • Amodeo S; 1 Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Rosman AS; 2 Section of Gastroenterology and Medicine Program, Mount Sinai School of Medicine and James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Desiato V; 1 Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Hindman NM; 3 Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • Newman E; 4 Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Berman R; 1 Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Pachter HL; 5 Department of Surgery, New York Harbor Healthcare System, 423 E 23rd St, Rm 4153 N, New York, NY 10010.
  • Melis M; 1 Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 211(5): W205-W216, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30240291
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) during DWI for predicting complete pathologic response of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic review of available literature was conducted to retrieve studies focused on the identification of complete pathologic response of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, through the assessment of ADC evaluated before, after, or both before and after treatment, as well as in terms of the difference between pretreatment and posttreatment ADC. Pooled mean pretreatment ADC, posttreatment ADC, and Δ-ADC (calculated as posttreatment ADC minus pretreatment ADC divided by pretreatment ADC and multiplied by 100) in complete responders versus incomplete responders were calculated. For each parameter, we also pooled sensitivity and specificity and calculated the area under the summary ROC curve.

RESULTS:

We found 10 prospective and eight retrospective studies. Overall, pathologic complete response was observed in 22.2% of patients. Pooled mean pretreatment ADC in complete responders was 0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s versus 0.89 × 10-3 mm2/s in incomplete responders (p = 0.33). Posttreatment ADC values were 1.51 × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.29 × 10-3 mm2/s, in complete and incomplete responders, respectively (p = 0.00001). The Δ-ADC percentages were also significantly higher in complete responders than in incomplete responders (59.7% vs 29.7%, respectively, p = 0.016). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.743, 0.755, and 0.841 for pretreatment ADC; 0.800, 0.737, and 0.782 for posttreatment ADC; and 0.832, 0.806, and 0.895 for Δ-ADC.

CONCLUSION:

Use of ADC during DWI is a promising technique for assessment of results of neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article