Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of stand-by emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Ferrara, Pietro; Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina; Agüero, Fernando; Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria.
Afiliação
  • Ferrara P; Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 5, Via Luciano Armanni, Naples 80138, Italy.
  • Masuet-Aumatell C; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Preventive Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Catalonia, Spain; Clinical Science Department, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobre
  • Agüero F; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Preventive Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Catalonia, Spain; Clinical Science Department, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobre
  • Ramon-Torrell JM; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Preventive Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Catalonia, Spain; Clinical Science Department, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobre
J Infect ; 77(6): 455-462, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267799
BACKGROUND: Since SBET is a controversial strategy for malaria self-treatment, this study aims to systematically review primary studies on its use amongst travellers. METHODS: Once studies were independently selected and data extracted, the pooled effect estimates (ES) were calculated through meta-analysis. Number of SBET users, of travellers carrying medications abroad, of subjects experiencing fever, of users complying with correct dosage, of those experiencing adverse effects, of those seeking medical care following SBET use, and those with positive malaria diagnostic test were collected and analysed. Subgroup and sensitive analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Of 935 titles and abstracts screened, 9 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and 7 in the meta-analysis for the main outcome, with a pooled ES of the overall use of SBET in the studied population of 2%. There was significant heterogeneity for all studies. The pooled ES of travellers who carried SBET medications abroad and of SBET users seeking medical care after self-administration was 65% and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated that the vast majority of travellers prescribed with SBET did not use it and the adherence to pre-travel recommendations on SBET use is suboptimal. Further studies to assess SBET cost-effectiveness and safety are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Viagem / Autoadministração / Tratamento de Emergência / Malária / Antimaláricos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Viagem / Autoadministração / Tratamento de Emergência / Malária / Antimaláricos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália