Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in Hospitalizations Between Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.
Ndumele, Chima D; Elliott, Marc N; Haviland, Amelia M; Burkhart, Q; Orr, Nate; Gaillot, Sarah; Cleary, Paul D.
Afiliação
  • Ndumele CD; Yale University, School of Public Health 60 College Street, New Haven, CT.
  • Elliott MN; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  • Haviland AM; Carnegie Mellon University, Heinz College.
  • Burkhart Q; RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Orr N; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  • Gaillot S; RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
  • Cleary PD; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of Consumer Assessment & Plan Performance, Baltimore, MD.
Med Care ; 57(1): 8-12, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30339575
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous studies found lower hospitalization rates for enrollees in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans than for beneficiaries with fee-for-service (FFS) coverage. MA enrollment is increasing, especially for those newly eligible for Medicare, but little is known about how service use in FFS or MA differs for new beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare differences in rates of hospitalization between MA and FFS. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

A retrospective study of hospitalization among FFS and MA respondents to the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (MCAHPS) survey. Differences in hospitalization rates were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models that controlled for patient sociodemographic and health characteristics. Models included an interaction between age and coverage type to determine whether patterns of care were distinct for enrollees recently eligible for Medicare. STUDY POPULATION In total, 259,335 respondents to the 2013 MCAHPS survey.

RESULTS:

In total, 14% of FFS and 12% of MA enrollees had ≥1 hospitalization in the 6 months before survey administration. Models adjusted for enrollee demographics found that MA enrollees had 0.81 the odds of being hospitalized relative to those with FFS coverage (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.84). Differences between groups were substantially reduced and no longer statistically significant when they were fully adjusted (adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.08). Models with interactions indicated no significant age differences in the MA/FFS hospitalization gap.

CONCLUSION:

Differences in hospital admissions between those with MA and FFS coverage appear to be primarily related to differences in health status.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado / Medicare Part C / Hospitalização Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado / Medicare Part C / Hospitalização Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article