Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inflammatory eruptions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A single-institution retrospective analysis with stratification of reactions by toxicity and implications for management.
Coleman, Emily; Ko, Christine; Dai, Feng; Tomayko, Mary M; Kluger, Harriet; Leventhal, Jonathan S.
Afiliação
  • Coleman E; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Ko C; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Dai F; Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Tomayko MM; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Kluger H; Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Leventhal JS; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: jonathan.leventhal@yale.edu.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 80(4): 990-997, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399387
BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of distinct inflammatory eruptions associated with checkpoint inhibitors. A better understanding of their severity, therapeutic response, and impact on cancer treatment is needed. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the different rashes associated with immunotherapy referred to our institution's oncodermatology clinic and inpatient consultative service and to evaluate their therapeutic response and impact on immunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients referred to the oncodermatology clinic or inpatient dermatology service during 2016-2018 at Yale-New Haven Hospital for eruptions that developed during immunotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 98 patients (51 men, 47 women) treated with checkpoint inhibitors developed 103 inflammatory eruptions, with a range of mean latency of 0.2-17.7 months. A minority of patients (25/103; 24.3%) required immunotherapy interruption; most of these cases involved immunobullous (7/8; 87.5%), lichenoid (8/26; 30.8%), maculopapular (6/18; 33.3%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome-like (2/2, 100%) reactions. Only 3 of 16 (18.8%) patients who had their immunotherapy interrupted had a grade 2 or 3 flare on rechallenge. Most reactions (93/103; 90.3%) responded to dermatologic therapy or immunotherapy interruption. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study from a single tertiary care center. CONCLUSION: A variety of inflammatory reactions might occur from immunotherapy with differing degrees of severity. While most rashes responded to topical treatment, immunobullous and exfoliative presentations frequently interrupted immunotherapy. Increased awareness and early recognition could reduce the need for unnecessary immunotherapy interruption.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Toxidermias / Exantema Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Toxidermias / Exantema Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article