Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score with survival in patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy.
Sugawara, K; Mori, K; Yagi, K; Aikou, S; Uemura, Y; Yamashita, H; Seto, Y.
Afiliação
  • Sugawara K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
  • Mori K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
  • Yagi K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Aikou S; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
  • Uemura Y; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
  • Yamashita H; Biostatistics Division, Clinical Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
  • Seto Y; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.
Dis Esophagus ; 32(4)2019 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30535140
ABSTRACT
Salvage esophagectomy (SALV) is potentially beneficial for patients with residual or relapsed esophageal carcinoma after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), although preoperatively identifying good candidates for SALV remains difficult. We investigated the prognostic impacts of inflammatory and nutritional status in patients undergoing SALV after dCRT. Forty-seven SALV patients were retrospectively reviewed, of whom 46 (98%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 1 (2%) adenocarcinoma. Possible prognostic factors included patients' demographic data, physical status, blood chemistry profiles, and clinical/pathological tumor features. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) was derived from preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin values. Thirty (64%), 11 (23%), and 6 (13%) patients were classified into the GPS 0, 1, and 2, respectively, groups. None of the possible prognostic factors showed significant correlations with GPS. Patients with GPS 0 had better outcomes than those with GPS 1 or GPS 2 (Median survivals 37.8, 15.9, and 5.1 months, respectively, P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, GPS 1 (HR 5.62, 95% CI 1.94-16.4, P = 0.002), GPS 2 (HR 9.10, 95% CI 2.60-31.8, P < 0.001), R1/2 resection (HR 16.3, 95% CI 3.62-86.7, P < 0.001) and incomplete response to dCRT (HR 3.53, 95% CI 1.12-12.5, P = 0.03) were all independent risk factors for a poor outcome. Preoperative GPS is potentially useful for predicting outcomes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing SALV.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Terapia de Salvação / Esofagectomia Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Dis Esophagus Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article