Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination.
McNeil, Deborah A; Mueller, Melissa; MacDonald, Shannon; McDonald, Sheila; Saini, Vineet; Kellner, James D; Tough, Suzanne.
Afiliação
  • McNeil DA; Maternal Newborn Child and Youth Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Mueller M; University of Calgary, Faculty of Nursing and Cumming School of Medicine Department of Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • MacDonald S; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • McDonald S; Research and Innovation, Population Public and Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, Southport Atrium, 10101 Southport Road S.W, Calgary, Alberta, T2W 3N2, Canada. melissa.mueller2@ahs.ca.
  • Saini V; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Kellner JD; Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Tough S; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 49, 2019 Jan 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30630511
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Understanding reasons for and against vaccination from the parental perspective is critical for designing vaccination campaigns and informing other interventions to increase vaccination uptake in Canada. The objective of this study was to understand maternal vaccination decision making for children.

METHODS:

Mothers participating in a longitudinal community-based pregnancy cohort, the All Our Babies study in Calgary, Alberta, completed open-ended survey questions providing explanations for the vaccination status of their child by 24 months postpartum. Qualitative responses were linked to administrative vaccination records to examine survey responses and recorded child vaccination status.

RESULTS:

There were 1560 open-ended responses available; 89% (n = 1391) provided explanations for vaccinating their children, 5% (n = 79) provided explanations for not vaccinating/delaying, and 6% (n = 90) provided explanations for both. Themes were similar for those vaccinating and not vaccinating/delaying; however, interpretations were different. Two broad themes were identified Sources of influence and Deliberative Processes. Sources of influence on decision making included personal, family, and external experiences. Deliberative Processes included risk, research, effectiveness, and balancing risks/benefits. Under Deliberative Processes, responsibility was a category for those vaccinating; while choice, instrumental/practical, and health issues were categories for those not vaccinating/delaying. Mothers' levels of conviction and motivation provided a Context for understanding their decision making perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS:

Vaccination decision making is complex and impacted by many factors that are similar but contribute to different decisions depending on mothers' perspectives. The results of this study indicate the need to examine new intervention approaches to increase uptake that recognize and address feelings of pressure and parental commitment to choice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atitude Frente a Saúde / Vacinação / Tomada de Decisões / Mães / Motivação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atitude Frente a Saúde / Vacinação / Tomada de Decisões / Mães / Motivação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá