Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Large variability in clinical judgement and definitions of left bundle branch block to identify candidates for cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
van Stipdonk, A M W; Vanbelle, S; Ter Horst, I A H; Luermans, J G; Meine, M; Maass, A H; Auricchio, A; Prinzen, F W; Vernooy, K.
Afiliação
  • van Stipdonk AMW; Cardiology department, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: twan.van.stipdonk@mumc.nl.
  • Vanbelle S; Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Ter Horst IAH; Cardiology department, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Luermans JG; Cardiology department, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Meine M; Cardiology department, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Maass AH; Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Auricchio A; Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Prinzen FW; Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
  • Vernooy K; Cardiology department, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Int J Cardiol ; 286: 61-65, 2019 07 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30661850
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology is associated with improved outcome of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) and is an important criterion for patient selection. There are, however, multiple definitions for LBBB. Moreover, applying these definitions seems subjective. We investigated the inter- and intraobserver agreement in the determination of LBBB using available definitions, and clinicians' judgement of LBBB.

METHODS:

Observers were provided with 12­lead ECGs of 100 randomly selected CRT patients. Four observers judged the ECGs based on different LBBB-definitions (ESC, AHA/ACC/HRS, MADIT, and Strauss). Additionally, four implanting cardiologists scored the same 100 ECGs based on their clinical judgement. Observer agreement was summarized through the proportion of agreement (P) and kappa coefficient (k).

RESULTS:

Relative intra-observer agreement using different LBBB definitions, and within clinical judgement was moderate (range k 0.47-0.74 and k = 0.76 (0.14), respectively). The inter-observer agreement between observers using LBBB definitions as well as between clinical observers was minimal to weak (range k 0.19-0.44 and k = 0.35 (0.20), respectively). The probability of classifying an ECG as LBBB by available definitions varied considerably (range 0.20-0.76). The agreement between different definitions of LBBB ranged from good (P = 0.95 (0.07)) to weak (P = 0.40 (0.22)). Furthermore, correlation between the different LBBB definitions and clinical judgement was poor (range phi 0.30-0.55).

CONCLUSION:

Significant variation in the probability of classifying LBBB is present in using different definitions and clinical judgement. Considerable intra- and inter-observer variability adds to this variation. Interdefinition agreement varies significantly and correlation of clinical judgement with LBBB classification by definitions is modest at best.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio de Ramo / Seleção de Pacientes / Eletrocardiografia / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bloqueio de Ramo / Seleção de Pacientes / Eletrocardiografia / Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca / Tomada de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article