Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rigid segmental cervical spine instrumentation is safe and efficacious in younger children.
Mitchell, Ana; Upasani, Vidyadhar V; Bartley, Carrie E; Newton, Peter O; Yaszay, Burt.
Afiliação
  • Mitchell A; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Upasani VV; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Bartley CE; Rady Children's Hospital, 3020 Children's Way, MC 5062, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
  • Newton PO; Rady Children's Hospital, 3020 Children's Way, MC 5062, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
  • Yaszay B; University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 35(6): 985-990, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30941509
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The utilization of cervical spine instrumentation in the young pediatric patient is not well reported. This study presents outcomes and complications of cervical spine instrumentation in patients who underwent cervical spine fusion surgery before age 10.

METHODS:

Radiographic and clinical data were collected on all patients who underwent cervical spine surgery with instrumentation at a single institution between January 1, 2006, and March 31, 2015. Patients were ≤ 10 years of age at the time of surgery with any cervical spine deformity/injury diagnosis. Patient demographics, details on cervical spine diagnosis, procedural data, imaging data, and postoperative follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS:

Twenty children met the criteria and were included in the study with a mean follow-up of 10.6 months (3 months-2 years). Initial indication for cervical spine correction surgery included deformity (7 cases), trauma (6 cases), instability (3 cases), stenosis (2 cases), rotary subluxation (1 case), and infection (1 case). Fifteen cases were treated with adult 3.5-mm cervical spine instrumentation, 3 with wiring (1 sublaminar and 2 spinous process), and 2 with cannulated screws. Postoperative immobilization included 16 halo fixation, 3 collars, and 1 CTO. Overall, there were five complications related to the surgery. Two patients who had wiring (1 sublaminar and 1 spinous process) developed a non-union and required revision surgery (1 with cannulated screws and 1 with 3.5-mm segmental cervical spine instrumentation). One patient developed a postoperative infection that required incision and drainage. Five patients developed superficial pin infections for their halo. Two deformity patients experienced neurological complications that were likely unrelated to the cervical instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rigid segmental fixation can be safe and efficacious when used in pediatric cervical spine patients. Whether used with halo or orthosis, patients experience minimal to no complications from the instrumentation and achieve successful fusion. Cervical spine wiring had a high risk of non-union requiring revision surgery. The incidence of wound infection was low with one in 20 cases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Childs Nerv Syst Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Vértebras Cervicais Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Childs Nerv Syst Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos