Comparison of fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels measured by different analyzers produced by different manufacturers.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is widely used as a biomarker of allergic airway inflammation. At present, both stationary chemiluminescence and portable electrochemical analyzers produced by different manufacturers are available. However, it remains debatable whether those analyzers are comparable to each other. We compare FeNO levels obtained by different analyzers.Methods: For the first study, 153 subjects were enrolled to compare differences in FeNO levels measured using three analyzers (NA623NP®, NObreath®, and NIOX MINO®) which were produced by different manufacturers. For the second study, 30 subjects were recruited to compare FeNO levels obtained by the two analyzers (NIOX MINO® and NIOX VERO®) produced by the same manufacturer. FeNO was measured twice using each analyzer in random order.Results: FeNO levels obtained using the NIOX MINO® and NObreath® were more variable than those measured using the NA623NP®. There were strong positive correlations in FeNO levels measured by the NA623NP®, NIOX MINO®, and NObreath® (p < 0.001). The NA623NP® and NIOX MINO® provided the highest and lowest FeNO levels, respectively; whereas, those obtained by NObreath® were intermediate. No significant differences were observed in FeNO levels obtained using the NIOX MINO® and NIOX VERO®.Conclusions: FeNO levels measured by the NIOX MINO® and NIOX VERO®, both of which were produced by the same manufacturer, have comparability. However, significant differences in FeNO levels exist when measured by analyzers manufactured by different manufacturers. This should be taken into account for FeNO measurement.