Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.
Ching-Companioni, Rafael A; Diehl, David L; Johal, Amitpal S; Confer, Bradley D; Khara, Harshit S.
Afiliação
  • Ching-Companioni RA; Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Diehl DL; Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Johal AS; Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Confer BD; Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Khara HS; Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
Endoscopy ; 51(11): 1059-1065, 2019 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31342474
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is a safe and effective method for accomplishing parenchymal liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare a 19 G aspiration needle (FNA) with a 19 G Franseen-tip core biopsy needle (FNB) for EUS-LB.

METHODS:

This was a prospective, parallel group, randomized trial comparing the tissue yields and adequacy of a 19 G FNA needle vs. a 19 G FNB needle for EUS-LB. The primary outcome was length of the longest piece of liver core specimen. Secondary outcomes were aggregate specimen length, number of complete portal triads (CPTs), and adverse events. One transgastric pass and one transduodenal pass were performed with the same needle in each patient. Specimen lengths were measured before and after histological processing.

RESULTS:

40 patients referred for EUS-LB were randomized to either the FNA group (n = 20) or the FNB group (n = 20). Both groups had similar patient characteristics. FNB biopsies yielded longer mean (standard deviation) specimen lengths (pre-processing mean 2.09 cm [0.41] vs. mean 1.47 cm [0.46], and post-processing mean 1.78 cm [0.66] vs. mean 1.05 cm [0.42]; both P < 0.001), a longer aggregate specimen length (pre-processing mean 15.78 cm [5.19] vs. 10.89 cm [4.38]; P = 0.003), and more CPTs (mean 42.6 25 vs 18.1 [9.3]; P < 0.001) compared with the FNA needle. There were no severe adverse events or difference in adverse event rate between the two needles. Post-biopsy pain was noted in 37.5 %.

CONCLUSION:

EUS-LB using the FNB needle delivered longer liver biopsy specimens with more CPTs than the regular (non-core) needle.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Doppler / Endossonografia / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Fígado / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Doppler / Endossonografia / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico / Fígado / Hepatopatias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos