[Supportive Care and Information Needs of Cancer Survivors: A Comparison of Two Cohorts of Longterm Cancers Survivors 5 and 10 Years after Primary Cancer Diagnosis]. / Bedürfnisse nach Information und Unterstützung bei Krebspatienten: ein Kohortenvergleich von Langzeitüberlebenden fünf und zehn Jahre nach einer Krebsdiagnose.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Addressing information and supportive care needs could enhance cancer survivors' ability to cope with the long-term and/or late effects of their disease. The study examines how long-term cancer survivors evaluate information received during the course of cancer and aims to identify supportive care needs. METHODS: The data were collected in a cross-sectional cancer registry cohort study including 1002 patients (participation rate 53%, five years post diagnosis n=660 (65.9%), 10 years post diagnosis n=342 (34.1%), mean age 66.7 years, male 52.9%, prostate cancer 25.5%). The survey instruments used included the SCNS-SF34-G, the PHQ-9, GAD-7, the Distress-Thermometer (DT) and a questionnaire measuring comorbidities. Descriptive and inference statistics were applied. RESULTS: Cancer Survivors perceived information on treatment decision-making as most helpful, whereas information about support offers was perceived as least helpful. One in 5 patients (19.6%) expressed a desire for further information. The majority of patients (81.3%) indicated at least one specific unmet supportive care need, on average 11 (SD=7.14) unmet supportive care needs. Most frequent supportive care needs are related to fear of cancer progression or recurrence, physical comorbidities and the wish for one member of the professional health care team with whom they can talk to continuously about medical issues across the treatment period. Higher physical comorbidity and distress are associated with an increased likelihood of further supportive care needs (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a need for survivorship care models that take into account medical aspects and psychosocial needs through a multidisciplinary approach.