Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.
Iqbal, Asif; Choi, Tae-Jeong; Kim, You-Sam; Lee, Yun-Mi; Zahangir Alam, M; Jung, Jong-Hyun; Choe, Ho-Sung; Kim, Jong-Joo.
Afiliação
  • Iqbal A; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
  • Choi TJ; Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Kim YS; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
  • Lee YM; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
  • Zahangir Alam M; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
  • Jung JH; Jung P&C Institute, Seoul 16950, Korea.
  • Choe HS; Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
  • Kim JJ; Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ; 32(11): 1657-1663, 2019 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31480201
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

A genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method was applied to evaluate accuracies of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of carcass and reproductive traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korean swine breeding farms.

METHODS:

The data comprised a total of 1,870, 696, and 1,723 genotyped pigs belonging to Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire breeds, respectively. Reference populations for carcass traits consisted of 888 Berkshire, 466 Duroc, and 1,208 Yorkshire pigs, and those for reproductive traits comprised 210, 154, and 890 dams for the respective breeds. The carcass traits analyzed were backfat thickness (BFT) and carcass weight (CWT), and the reproductive traits were total number born (TNB) and number born alive (NBA). For each trait, GEBV accuracies were evaluated with a GEBV BLUP model and realized GEBVs.

RESULTS:

The accuracies under the GBLUP model for BFT and CWT ranged from 0.33-0.72 and 0.33-0.63, respectively. For NBA and TNB, the model accuracies ranged 0.32 to 0.54 and 0.39 to 0.56, respectively. The realized accuracy estimates for BFT and CWT ranged 0.30 to 0.46 and 0.09 to 0.27, respectively, and 0.50 to 0.70 and 0.70 to 0.87 for NBA and TNB, respectively. For the carcass traits, the GEBV accuracies under the GBLUP model were higher than the realized GEBV accuracies across the breed populations, while for reproductive traits the realized accuracies were higher than the model based GEBV accuracies.

CONCLUSION:

The genomic prediction accuracy increased with reference population size and heritability of the trait. The GEBV accuracies were also influenced by GEBV estimation method, such that careful selection of animals based on the estimated GEBVs is needed. GEBV accuracy will increase with a larger sized reference population, which would be more beneficial for traits with low heritability such as reproductive traits.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article