A randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG) as palliative care for patients with malignant bowel obstruction: the JIVROSG0805 trial.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the superiority of percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing over nasogastric tubing as palliative care for bowel obstruction in patients with terminal malignancy was conducted. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were patients with malignant bowel obstruction with no prospect of improvement, for whom surgery was not indicated and with a Palliative Prognostic Index of < 6. They were randomly allocated in a 11 ratio to receive either percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG group) or nasogastric tubing (NGT group). Their symptom scores (the worst 0 to no symptoms 10) were measured for a 2-week period after enrollment, and the areas under the curves for the two groups were compared. The EQ-5D and SF-8 were also used to assess overall quality of life. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between October 2009 and January 2015, with 21 allocated to the PTEG group and 19 to the NGT group. The mean areas under the curves (95% confidence intervals) for the PTEG group and the NGT groups were 149.6 (120.3-178.8) and 44.9 (16.4-73.5), respectively, significantly higher for the NGT group (p < 0.0001). The secondary endpoints of quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D and SF-8 scores were also significantly higher for patients in the PTEG group (p = 0.0036, p = 0.0020). There was no difference in survival between the groups. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of quality of life, percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing was superior to nasogastric tubing as palliative care for patients with bowel obstruction due to terminal malignancy.