Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of a train-of-four ratio of 0.95 versus 0.9 for tracheal extubation: an exploratory analysis of POPULAR data.
Blobner, Manfred; Hunter, Jennifer M; Meistelman, Claude; Hoeft, Andreas; Hollmann, Markus W; Kirmeier, Eva; Lewald, Heidrun; Ulm, Kurt.
Afiliação
  • Blobner M; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: m.blobner@tum.de.
  • Hunter JM; Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
  • Meistelman C; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Hoeft A; Department of Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Hollmann MW; Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kirmeier E; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Lewald H; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Ulm K; Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Br J Anaesth ; 124(1): 63-72, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607388
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The prospective observational European multicentre cohort study (POPULAR) of postoperative pulmonary complications (NCT01865513) did not demonstrate that adherence to the recommended train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9 before extubation was associated with better pulmonary outcomes from the first postoperative day up to hospital discharge. We re-analysed the POPULAR data as to whether there existed a better threshold for TOFR recovery before extubation to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who had quantitative neuromuscular monitoring (87% acceleromyography).

METHODS:

To identify the optimal TOFR, the complete case cohort of patients with quantitative neuromuscular monitoring (n=3150) was split into several pairs of sub-cohorts related to TOFR values from 0.86 to 0.96; values of 0.97 and higher could not be used as the sub-cohorts were too small. The optimal TOFR was considered to have the lowest P-value from multivariate logistic regression calculated for each of the TOFR values. Data are presented as adjusted absolute risk reduction or median difference with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS:

Extubating patients with TOFR >0.95 rather than >0.9 reduced the adjusted risk of postoperative pulmonary complications by 3.5% (0.7-6.0%) from that reported in POPULAR (11.3%). Increasing the recommended TOFR from 0.9 to 0.95 reduced the adjusted risk by 4.9% (1.2-8.5%). Sub-cohorts resulting from 11 propensity score matching revealed that sugammadex had been given in higher doses by 0.30 (0.13-0.48) mg kg-1 in the sub-cohort with TOFR > 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS:

A post hoc analysis of patients receiving quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular function suggests that postoperative pulmonary complications are reduced for TOFR > 0.95 before tracheal extubation compared with TOFR > 0.9. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01865513.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Extubação / Monitoração Neuromuscular / Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Extubação / Monitoração Neuromuscular / Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article