Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Acute Care Remote Triage Systems: a Systematic Review.
Boggan, Joel C; Shoup, John Paul; Whited, John D; Van Voorhees, Elizabeth; Gordon, Adelaide M; Rushton, Sharron; Lewinski, Allison A; Tabriz, Amir A; Adam, Soheir; Fulton, Jessica; Kosinski, Andrzej S; Van Noord, Megan G; Williams, John W; Goldstein, Karen M; Gierisch, Jennifer M.
Afiliação
  • Boggan JC; Hospital Medicine Team (111M), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Joel.boggan@va.gov.
  • Shoup JP; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Joel.boggan@va.gov.
  • Whited JD; BJC Medical Group, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Van Voorhees E; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gordon AM; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Rushton S; Hospital Medicine Team (111M), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Lewinski AA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Tabriz AA; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Adam S; School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Fulton J; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Kosinski AS; Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Van Noord MG; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Williams JW; Hospital Medicine Team (111M), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
  • Goldstein KM; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Gierisch JM; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(7): 2136-2145, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898116
BACKGROUND: Technology-based systems can facilitate remote decision-making to triage patients to the appropriate level of care. Despite technologic advances, the effects of implementation of these systems on patient and utilization outcomes are unclear. We evaluated the effects of remote triage systems on healthcare utilization, case resolution, and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: English-language searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL were performed from inception until July 2018. Randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies of remote triage services that reported healthcare utilization, case resolution, and patient safety outcomes were included. Two reviewers assessed study and intervention characteristics independently for study quality, strength of evidence, and risk of bias. RESULTS: The literature search identified 5026 articles, of which eight met eligibility criteria. Five randomized, two controlled before-and-after, and one interrupted time series study assessed 3 categories of remote triage services: mode of delivery, triage professional type, and system organizational level. No study evaluated any other delivery mode other than telephone and in-person. Meta-analyses were unable to be performed because of study design and outcome heterogeneity; therefore, we narratively synthesized data. Overall, most studies did not demonstrate a decrease in primary care (PC) or emergency department (ED) utilization, with some studies showing a significant increase. Evidence suggested local, practice-based triage systems have greater case resolution and refer fewer patients to PC or ED services than regional/national systems. No study identified statistically significant differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our review found limited evidence that remote triage reduces the burden of PC or ED utilization. However, remote triage by telephone can produce a high rate of call resolution and appears to be safe. Further study of other remote triage modalities is needed to realize the promise of remote triage services in optimizing healthcare outcomes. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This study was registered and followed a published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019112262).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos