Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Product dose considerations for real-world hand sanitiser efficacy.
Kenters, N; Eikelenboom-Boskamp, A; Hines, J; McGeer, A; Huijskens, E G W; Voss, A.
Afiliação
  • Kenters N; Department of Medical Microbiology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: N.kenters@gmail.com.
  • Eikelenboom-Boskamp A; Department of Medical Microbiology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Hines J; SC Johnson Professional Ltd, Research and Development, Denby, Derbyshire, UK.
  • McGeer A; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto Ontario, Canada.
  • Huijskens EGW; Department of Medical Microbiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Voss A; Department of Medical Microbiology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(5): 503-506, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924389
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Alcohol based hand rubs (ABHR) are extremely effective at reducing microbial contamination and have an essential role in best practice hand hygiene described by the World Health Organization.

METHODS:

We determined ABHR drying time when performing hand hygiene in a laboratory setting. Which was followed by identifying the amount of ABHR needed for complete hand coverage. When the aforementioned was analyzed real-time data were gathered to examine the amount used for hand hygiene in a hospital setting. In parallel hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) were monitored for drying time and perception on ABHR use.

RESULTS:

In 86% (24,446,397/28,280,383) of the events a single dose of ABHR was used on clinical wards. Twenty-four HCWs expected hand hygiene to take 7.5 seconds (median; range 3-30 seconds). Forty-three HCWs show that 1.5 mL ABHR dose achieves the desired drying time according to World Health Organization guidelines (av. median 26 seconds), but is consistently perceived to have a longer drying time than expected (av. median 18 seconds). In-vivo results (n = 10) indicate that 2.25 mL ABHR is required for adequate coverage (82%-90%) of both sides of the hand.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results indicate that set standards for the use of ABHR do not match "in-vivo" behaviour of HCWs. Perceived drying times are shorter than actual drying time. The needed drying time to reach acceptable antimicrobial efficacy of ABHRs should be revisited.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fatores de Tempo / Desinfecção das Mãos / Higienizadores de Mão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fatores de Tempo / Desinfecção das Mãos / Higienizadores de Mão Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Infect Control Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article