Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longer-term effectiveness of systemic family therapy compared with treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: An extended follow up of pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Cottrell, D J; Wright-Hughes, A; Eisler, I; Fortune, S; Green, J; House, A O; Kerfoot, M; Owens, D W; Simic, M; McLellan, V; Tubeuf, S; Farrin, A J.
Afiliação
  • Cottrell DJ; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Wright-Hughes A; Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Eisler I; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurological Science Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Fortune S; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.
  • Green J; Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • House AO; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Kerfoot M; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Owens DW; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Simic M; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • McLellan V; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Tubeuf S; Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Farrin AJ; Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
EClinicalMedicine ; 18: 100246, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31956857
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Self-harm in adolescents is common and repetition frequent. Evidence for effective interventions to reduce self-harm is limited. Long term follow-up of existing studies is rare.

METHODS:

Extended follow up, from 18 to at least 36-months, of the SHIFT trial a pragmatic, multi-centre, individually-randomised, controlled trial involving young people (11-17) who had self-harmed at least twice and presented to Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). SHIFT evaluated manualised family therapy (FT) versus treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing repetition of self-harm leading to hospital attendance 18 months post-randomisation.We obtained ONS mortality data, adult mental health data, and further details of hospital attendance from routine Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data plus researcher follow-up. We assessed longer-term differences in outcome using multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis, and assessed all-cause mortality and morbidity relating to hospital attendances for reasons other than self-harm. STUDY REGISTRATION ISRCTN 59793150.

OUTCOMES:

The original sample of 832 were randomised between April 2010 and December 2013. Extended follow-up continued until February 2017 for a median 55·4 months (range 0-82·5 months), providing post 18-month data for 804 (96·6%) participants, of whom 785 (94·4%) had a minimum of 36-months follow-up.There was no evidence of a between-group difference in the primary outcome during the extended follow-up period (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1·03; 95% CI 0·83, 1·28; p-value=0·78), consistent with our findings in the original trial with 18 months follow-up (HR 1·14, 95% CI 0·87, 1·49; p-value 0·33). There was a reduced rate of self-harm in older participants aged 15-17 (HR 0·7, 95% CI 0·56, 0·88), as compared with those aged 11-14; and significantly increased rates of self-harm in participants whose index episode combined self-injury and poisoning (HR 1·8, 95% CI 1·2, 2·7). Two deaths were reported during the extended follow up period.

INTERPRETATION:

For adolescents referred to CAMHS after self-harm, having self-harmed at least once before, trial FT confers no benefits over TAU in reducing subsequent hospitalisation for self-harm over 18 months or 36 months.

FUNDING:

NIHR HTA Reference 07/33/01.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_technology_assessment Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_technology_assessment Idioma: En Revista: EClinicalMedicine Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido