Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of a standardized voiding management protocol to reduce unnecessary re-catheterization - A quality improvement project.
Brackmann, Melissa; Carballo, Erica; Uppal, Shitanshu; Torski, Julie; Reynolds, R Kevin; McLean, Karen.
Afiliação
  • Brackmann M; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: mkwylie@med.umich.edu.
  • Carballo E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, 20 S. Park St., Madison, WI 53715, USA.
  • Uppal S; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: uppal@med.umich.edu.
  • Torski J; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
  • Reynolds RK; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: rkr@med.umich.edu.
  • McLean K; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: karenmcl@umich.edu.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(2): 487-493, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32033800
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To design and implement a standardized postoperative voiding management protocol that accurately identifies patients with urinary retention and reduces unnecessary re-catheterization.

METHODS:

A postoperative voiding management protocol was designed and implemented in patients undergoing major, inpatient, non-radical abdominal surgery with a gynecologic oncologist. No patients had epidural catheters. The implemented quality improvement (QI) protocol included 1) Foley removal at six hours postoperatively; 2) universal bladder scan after the first void; and 3) limiting re-catheterization to patients with bladder scan volumes >150 ml. A total of 96 patients post-protocol implementation were compared to 52 patients pre-protocol. Along with baseline demographic data and timing of catheter removal, we recorded the presence or absence of urinary retention and/or unnecessary re-catheterization and postoperative urinary tract infection rates. Fisher's exact test and student's t-tests were performed for comparisons.

RESULTS:

The overall rate of postoperative urinary retention was 21.6% (32/148). The new voiding management protocol reduced the rate of unnecessary re-catheterization by 90% (13.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01), without overlooking true urinary retention (23.1% vs 20.8%, p = 0.83). Additionally, there was a significant increase in hospital-defined early discharge prior to 1100 AM (4.0% vs 22.0%, p = 0.022). There was no difference in the postoperative urinary tract infection rate between the groups (p = 1.00). Risk factors associated with urinary retention included older age (p < 0.01), use of medications with anticholinergic properties (p < 0.01), and preexisting urinary dysfunction (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of this new voiding management protocol reduced unnecessary re-catheterization, captured and treated true urinary retention, and facilitated early hospital discharge.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retenção Urinária / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retenção Urinária / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article