Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why Physicians Prescribe Prophylactic Seizure Medications after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.
Pinto, Daniel; Prabhakaran, Shyam; Tipton, Elizabeth; Naidech, Andrew M.
Afiliação
  • Pinto D; Marquette University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Prabhakaran S; University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Tipton E; Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
  • Naidech AM; Northwestern University at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: a-naidech@northwestern.edu.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(4): 104628, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32033905
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Seizures are a morbid complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and increase the risk for herniation, status epilepticus, and worse patient outcomes. Prophylactic levetiracetam is administered to approximately 40% of patients with ICH. It is unclear which patients are consciously selected for treatment by physicians. We sought to determine how patients are selected for treatment with prophylactic levetiracetam after ICH.

METHODS:

We administered an adaptive conjoint analysis using decision making software to an NIH Stroke Trials Network Working Group. The adaptive conjoint analysis determines the most influential attributes for making a decision in an iterative, algorithm-driven process. We asked respondents which would most influence a decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam. The attributes and their levels were taken from published phenotypes associated with prophylactic seizure medications and the likelihood of seizures after ICH hematoma location (lobar or basal ganglia), hematoma volume (<=10 mL or >10 mL), level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale 5-12 or Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15), age (<65 or ≥65 years), and race (White or Caucasian or Black/African American). The algorithm terminated when the attributes were ranked from most to least influential.

RESULTS:

The study sample included 27 respondents who completed the adaptive conjoint analysis out of 42 who responded to the survey with a mean age of 43.4 ± 9.4 years. The attribute with the greatest weight was hematoma location (30%), followed by reduced level of consciousness (24%), hematoma volume (19%), race (14%), and age (13%). Ranks of attributes were different (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam to patients with ICH is driven by lobar hematoma location and depressed level of consciousness. Future research on prophylactic seizure medication could focus on patients most likely to receive it.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Convulsões / Padrões de Prática Médica / Hemorragia Cerebral / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Levetiracetam / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Convulsões / Padrões de Prática Médica / Hemorragia Cerebral / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Levetiracetam / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article