Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of line and floor type on growth performance and feather characterization during the growth period of White Roman geese.
Lin, Min Jung; Chang, Shen Chang; Chen, Tzu Jou; Lin, Wei Chih; Peng, Shao Yu; Lee, Tzu Tai.
Afiliação
  • Lin MJ; Changhua Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Changhua 52149, Taiwan.
  • Chang SC; Kaohsiung Animal Propagation Station, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
  • Chen TJ; Department of Animal Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
  • Lin WC; Department of Animal Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.
  • Peng SY; Department of Animal Science, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
  • Lee TT; Department of Animal Science, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ; 33(9): 1455-1462, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054212
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether goose growth and feather characteristics are influenced by their line and feeding surroundings, inclusive of floor materials and types, since there are no reports regarding these factors. METHODS: The 240 White Roman geese which were hatched and sex identified came from 3 commercial goose farms. They were randomly distributed to 24 pens depending on a completely random design. The study continued for 13 weeks and included 3 lines of commercial geese and 2 floor types (cement strip floor [CSF] or cement floor [CF]). RESULTS: The day one gosling weight from A farm was lower than other two farms (96 g vs 107 and 115 g; p<0.001). Afterwards, the body weight, back length, keel length, chest girth and main wing feather length among 3 farms showed no significance difference prior to 12 weeks. The CF group showed heavier body weight, shorter back length, longer keel length, shorter chest girth and shorter main wing feather length than the CSF group prior to 12 weeks. The down weight in the CF was heavier than the CSF group (57.1 g vs 41.8 g; p<0.01) prior to 13 weeks. CONCLUSION: The body weight showed the positive relations for dry feather weight (r = 0.59), down weight (r = 0.69), percent of the down weight of live body weight prior to 13 weeks (r = 0.61).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan