Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Human amniotic membrane allograft, a novel treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Su, Ya-Na; Zhao, Ding-Yun; Li, Yong-Hong; Yu, Tian-Qi; Sun, Huan; Wu, Xin-Yu; Zhou, Xiao-Qin; Li, Jing.
Afiliação
  • Su YN; Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Zhao DY; Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Li YH; Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Yu TQ; Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Sun H; Mental Health Center and Psychiatric Laboratory, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Wu XY; Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Zhou XQ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
  • Li J; Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Int Wound J ; 17(3): 753-764, 2020 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32119765
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of human amniotic membrane (HAM) allograft in treating chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a comprehensive search of randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science was conducted to December 7, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete healing. The secondary outcomes were mean time to complete healing and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. We identified 257 articles, of which 7 articles (465 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of complete wound healing in HAM plus standard of care (SOC) group was 3.88 times as high as that in SOC alone (RR 3.88 [95% CI 2.34, 6.44]) at 6 weeks, and 2.01 times at 12 weeks (RR 2.01 [95%CI 1.45, 2.77]). The intervention group had a significantly shorter time to complete healing (MD -30.33 days, [95% CI -37.95, -22.72]). The number needed to treat within 6 weeks was 2.3 ([95% CI 1.8, 3.1]). No significant difference was shown in adverse events. Results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis. Hence, HAM plus SOC is effective and safe in treating chronic DFUs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Curativos Biológicos / Pé Diabético / Âmnio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Wound J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Curativos Biológicos / Pé Diabético / Âmnio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Wound J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China