Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral erythromycin in pityriasis lichenoides chronica and pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta.
Chen, Yunliu; Zhao, Mutong; Xiang, Xin; Wang, Zhaoyang; Xu, Zigang; Ma, Lin.
Afiliação
  • Chen Y; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • Zhao M; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • Xiang X; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • Wang Z; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • Xu Z; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • Ma L; Department of Dermatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(3): e13311, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32174014
ABSTRACT
Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) is an uncommon cutaneous disorder. Oral erythromycin is proposed to be effective in treating the disease. Here, we reported 16 pediatric patients with PL and systematically reviewed published literatures on erythromycin treatment response in pediatric PL patients, to observe the different treatment response to erythromycin in the pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC) and the pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) groups. Sixteen patients, 8 with PLC and 8 with PLEVA, were treated with erythromycin. In the PLC group, 25% (n = 2) patients responded to erythromycin, while in the PLEVA group, 87.5% (n = 7) patients responded to erythromycin. The response rate was higher in the PLEVA group than the PLC group (P =.05). No side effect was reported in the 16 patients. A total of 34 children including 16 from our studies were included for further descriptive analysis, in which 12 had PLC and 22 had PLEVA. In the PLC group, 41.7% (n = 5) of patients responded to erythromycin while in the PLEVA group, 90.9 % (n = 20) of patients responded. The response rate was higher in the PLEVA group than the PLC group (P = .004). In conclusion, erythromycin is effective and safe in the treatment of children with PL, and erythromycin was more effective in patients with PLEVA than PLC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pitiríase Liquenoide Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pitiríase Liquenoide Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China