Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A; Munding, Bibi; Ziebe, Søren; Robertson, Sarah A.
Afiliação
  • Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. kenny.rodriguez-wallberg@sll.se.
  • Munding B; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. kenny.rodriguez-wallberg@sll.se.
  • Ziebe S; CooperSurgical, ORIGIO a/S, Måløv, Denmark.
  • Robertson SA; The Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 301(5): 1341-1346, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274634
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate implantation potential of cleavage-stage embryos cultured in medium containing 2 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus control medium, according to embryo morphological quality and then transferred on day 3.

METHODS:

Explorative secondary data analysis of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective study of 1149 couples with embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI. This analysis includes a subgroup of 422 subjects with either single-embryo transfer (SET, N = 286) or double-embryo transfer of two embryos with equivalent morphological quality (DET, N = 136). Implantation rate and live birth rate were assessed according to category of morphological embryo quality on day 3.

RESULTS:

Culture with GM-CSF did not increase the implantation rate for embryos classified as poor quality. A trend towards greater benefit of GM-CSF on implantation and survival until live birth for top-quality embryos (TQEs) compared with poor-quality embryos was observed, although not statistically significant. For TQEs, the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby was 40.9 ± 5.3% (GM-CSF) versus 30.5 ± 4.6% (control) (P = 0.24; odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.59), and for embryos with less than 6 cells at day 3 this same rate was 7.4 ± 3.3% (GM-CSF) versus 12.0 ± 4.0% (control) (P = 0.26; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17-1.61).

CONCLUSION:

This exploratory analysis is consistent with GM-CSF protecting morphologically normal embryos from culture-induced stress and does not support an effect of GM-CSF in rescuing poor-quality embryos. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00565747.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fertilização in vitro / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fertilização in vitro / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia