Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Reported Burden of Dry Eye Disease in the United States: Results of an Online Cross-Sectional Survey.
Dana, Reza; Meunier, Juliette; Markowitz, Jessica T; Joseph, Corey; Siffel, Csaba.
Afiliação
  • Dana R; Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: Reza_Dana@meei.harvard.edu.
  • Meunier J; Modus Outcomes, Lyon, France.
  • Markowitz JT; Modus Outcomes, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Joseph C; Takeda, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Siffel C; Takeda, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA; College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 216: 7-17, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277941
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate functional vision, general health status, and work productivity in individuals with and without dry eye disease (DED).

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS:

Setting:

General US population (2018). STUDY POPULATION Adults ≥18 years with (n = 1003) or without (n = 1006) self-reported DED. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

All respondents completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ) and the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L). All respondents with DED completed the eye dryness score (EDS) visual analogue scale, Ocular Comfort Index (OCI), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Half of respondents with DED completed the Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) questionnaire; the other half completed the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5) and Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED), McMonnies, and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaires. All analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS:

Respondents with DED reported more comorbidities, greater exposure to adverse environmental conditions, and lower (worse) mean (standard deviation) scores on the modified Rasch-scored 28-item VFQ (VFQ-28R) total score (68.8 [11.9] vs 81.2 [12.7]) and EQ-5D-5L (0.82 [0.13] vs 0.88 [0.14]) than respondents without DED. Respondents with DED and EDS ≥60 (highest discomfort) fared worse on OCI, VFQ-28R, and WPAI than respondents with DED and EDS <40 (lowest discomfort). Similar findings were observed with IDEEL, DEQ-5, SPEED, McMonnies, and SANDE scores.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a substantial burden of DED on functional vision, general health status, and productivity; and further, these parameters appear to worsen with increasing EDS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes do Olho Seco / Perfil de Impacto da Doença Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes do Olho Seco / Perfil de Impacto da Doença Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article