Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool for Inpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship.
Ridgway, Jessica P; Robicsek, Ari; Shah, Nirav; Smith, Becky A; Singh, Kamaljit; Semel, Jeffery; Acree, Mary Ellen; Grant, Jennifer; Ravichandran, Urmila; Peterson, Lance R.
Afiliação
  • Ridgway JP; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Robicsek A; Providence St. Joseph Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Shah N; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Smith BA; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Singh K; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Semel J; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Acree ME; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Grant J; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Ravichandran U; NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
  • Peterson LR; Pritzer School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(9): e265-e271, 2021 05 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712674
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The weighted incidence syndromic combination antibiogram (WISCA) is an antimicrobial stewardship tool that utilizes electronic medical record data to provide real-time clinical decision support regarding empiric antibiotic prescription in the hospital setting. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of WISCA utilization for empiric antibiotic prescription on hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS:

We performed a crossover randomized controlled trial of the WISCA tool at 4 hospitals. Study participants included adult inpatients receiving empiric antibiotics for urinary tract infection (UTI), abdominal-biliary infection (ABI), pneumonia, or nonpurulent cellulitis. Antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) physicians utilized WISCA and clinical guidelines to provide empiric antibiotic recommendations. The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, Clostridioides difficile infection, acquisition of multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRO), and antibiotics costs.

RESULTS:

In total, 6849 participants enrolled in the study. There were no overall differences in outcomes among the intervention versus control groups. Participants with cellulitis in the intervention group had significantly shorter mean LOS compared to participants with cellulitis in the control group (coefficient estimate = 0.53 [-0.97, -0.09], P = .0186). For patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP), the intervention group had significantly lower odds of 30-day mortality compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] .58, 95% confidence interval [CI], .396, .854, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of WISCA was not associated with improved outcomes for UTI and ABI. Guidelines-based interventions were associated with decreased LOS for cellulitis and decreased mortality for CAP.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Gestão de Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Gestão de Antimicrobianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos