Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of genomic prediction accuracy using different selection and evaluation approaches in a simulated Korean beef cattle population.
Nwogwugwu, Chiemela Peter; Kim, Yeongkuk; Choi, Hyunji; Lee, Jun Heon; Lee, Seung-Hwan.
Afiliação
  • Nwogwugwu CP; Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
  • Kim Y; Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
  • Choi H; Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
  • Lee JH; Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
  • Lee SH; Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ; 33(12): 1912-1921, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32819072
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed genomic prediction accuracies based on different selection methods, evaluation procedures, training population (TP) sizes, heritability (h2) levels, marker densities and pedigree error (PE) rates in a simulated Korean beef cattle population. METHODS: A simulation was performed using two different selection methods, phenotypic and estimated breeding value (EBV), with an h2 of 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 and marker densities of 10, 50, or 777K. A total of 275 males and 2,475 females were randomly selected from the last generation to simulate ten recent generations. The simulation of the PE dataset was modified using only the EBV method of selection with a marker density of 50K and a heritability of 0.3. The proportions of errors substituted were 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively. Genetic evaluations were performed using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) with different weighted values. The accuracies of the predictions were determined. RESULTS: Compared with phenotypic selection, the results revealed that the prediction accuracies obtained using GBLUP and ssGBLUP increased across heritability levels and TP sizes during EBV selection. However, an increase in the marker density did not yield higher accuracy in either method except when the h2 was 0.3 under the EBV selection method. Based on EBV selection with a heritability of 0.1 and a marker density of 10K, GBLUP and ssGBLUP_0.95 prediction accuracy was higher than that obtained by phenotypic selection. The prediction accuracies from ssGBLUP_0.95 outperformed those from the GBLUP method across all scenarios. When errors were introduced into the pedigree dataset, the prediction accuracies were only minimally influenced across all scenarios. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the use of ssGBLUP_0.95, EBV selection, and low marker density could help improve genetic gains in beef cattle.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article