Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of pre-transplant biopsy on 5-year outcomes of expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation.
Yap, Yun Ting; Ho, Quan Yao; Kee, Terence; Ng, Chee Yong; Chionh, Chang Yin.
Afiliação
  • Yap YT; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  • Ho QY; Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Kee T; Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore.
  • Ng CY; Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Chionh CY; Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singapore.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(1): 70-77, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32986301
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Compared to Standard Criteria Donors (SCD), Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) kidneys are associated with poorer outcomes, although pre-transplant biopsy may mitigate risks. This study assessed 5-year outcomes of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, comparing recipients of ECD allografts evaluated histologically to recipients of SCD and ECD kidneys assessed clinically.

METHODS:

This is a single-centre retrospective study. From November 2005 to December 2009 (Era 1), donors were assessed clinically for suitability for kidney donation. From December 2009 to October 2017 (Era 2), kidneys from ECDs and diabetics underwent pre-transplant biopsy and were allocated based on Remuzzi score. Outcomes of Era 1 and 2 recipients were compared.

RESULTS:

ECD kidney transplantation increased from 30.4% to 40.0% from Era 1 to 2. Univariable Cox regression, stratified by transplant era, found that 5-year graft loss was highest with Era 1 ECD (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.5, P = .027) while graft loss for Era 2 ECD recipients was similar to SCD recipients. There was no difference in 5-year recipient survival. Amongst Era 1 ECD recipients, 51.2% experienced rejection compared to 30.8-41.5% for other subgroups. Five-year eGFR was higher with Era 2 ECD at 48.4 (33.3-60.7) ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to 42.2 (35.8-57.3) ml/min/1.73 m2 for Era 1 ECD. However, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION:

Introduction of pre-transplant biopsy assessment may be associated with improved outcomes of ECD kidney recipients such that they are now comparable to SCD kidney recipients, with benefits persisting over 5 years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biópsia / Transplante de Rim / Seleção do Doador / Rejeição de Enxerto / Rim / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Nephrology (Carlton) Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biópsia / Transplante de Rim / Seleção do Doador / Rejeição de Enxerto / Rim / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Nephrology (Carlton) Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura