Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"When Offered to Participate": A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Unger, Joseph M; Hershman, Dawn L; Till, Cathee; Minasian, Lori M; Osarogiagbon, Raymond U; Fleury, Mark E; Vaidya, Riha.
Afiliação
  • Unger JM; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Hershman DL; SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Till C; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Minasian LM; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Osarogiagbon RU; SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Fleury ME; National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Vaidya R; Baptist Memorial Health Care/Mid-South Minority-Underserved NCORP, Memphis, TN, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 113(3): 244-257, 2021 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022716
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient participation in clinical trials is vital for knowledge advancement and outcomes improvement. Few adult cancer patients participate in trials. Although patient.decision-making about trial participation has been frequently examined, the participation rate for patients actually offered a trial is unknown.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis using 3 major search engines was undertaken. We identified studies from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2020, that examined clinical trial participation in the United States. Studies must have specified the numbers of patients offered a trial and the number enrolled. A random effects model of proportions was used. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS:

We identified 35 studies (30 about treatment trials and 5 about cancer control trials) among which 9759 patients were offered trial participation. Overall, 55.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 49.4% to 60.5%) of patients agreed to enroll. Participation rates did not differ between treatment (55.0%, 95% CI = 48.9% to 60.9%) and cancer control trials (55.3%, 95% CI = 38.9% to 71.1%; P = .98). Black patients participated at similar rates (58.4%, 95% CI = 46.8% to 69.7%) compared with White patients (55.1%, 95% CI = 44.3% to 65.6%; P = .88). The main reasons for nonparticipation were treatment choice or lack of interest.

CONCLUSIONS:

More than half of all cancer patients offered a clinical trial do participate. These findings upend several conventional beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation, including that Black patients are less likely to agree to participate and that patient decision-making is the primary barrier to participation. Policies and interventions to improve clinical trial participation should focus more on modifiable systemic structural and clinical barriers, such as improving access to available trials and broadening eligibility criteria.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos