Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Healthcare utilization and cost in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure undergoing catheter ablation.
Field, Michael E; Gold, Michael R; Rahman, Motiur; Goldstein, Laura; Maccioni, Sonia; Srivastava, Abhishek; Khanna, Rahul; Piccini, Jonathan P; Friedman, Daniel J.
Afiliação
  • Field ME; Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Gold MR; Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • Rahman M; Medical Device Epidemiology, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Goldstein L; Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Irvine, California, USA.
  • Maccioni S; Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, California, USA.
  • Srivastava A; Mu Sigma, Bangalore, India.
  • Khanna R; Medical Device Epidemiology, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
  • Piccini JP; Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Friedman DJ; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(12): 3166-3175, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022815
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, little is known about how healthcare utilization and cost change after ablation in this population. We sought to determine healthcare utilization and cost patterns among patients with AF and HF undergoing ablation.

METHODS:

Using a large United States administrative database, we identified (n = 1568) treated with ablation with a primary and secondary diagnosis of AF and HF, respectively, were evaluated 1-year pre- and postablation for outcomes including inpatient admissions (AF or HF), emergency department (ED) visits, cardioversions, length of stay (LOS), and cost. A secondary analysis was extended to 3-years postablation.

RESULTS:

Reductions were observed in AF-related admissions (64%), LOS (65%), cardioversions (52%), ED visits (51%, all values, p < .0001), and HF-related admissions (22%, p = .01). There was a 40% reduction in inpatient admission cost ($4165 preablation to $2510 postablation, p < .0001). In a sensitivity analysis excluding repeat-ablation patients, a greater reduction in overall AF management cost was observed compared to the full cohort (-43% vs. -2%). Comparing 1-year pre- to 3-years postablation, both total mean AF-management cost ($850 per-patient per-month 1-year pre- to $546 3-years postablation, p < .0001) and AF-related healthcare utilization was reduced.

CONCLUSIONS:

Catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF resulted in significant reductions in healthcare utilization and cost through 3-years of follow-up. This reduction was observed regardless of whether repeat ablation was performed, reflecting the positive impact of ablation on longer term cost reduction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Insuficiência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos