Myringoplasty With an Ultrathin Cartilage-Perichondrium Complex Graft Versus Temporalis Fascia Graft: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare endoscopic myringoplasty using the cartilage-perichondrium complex as a graft (test group) with temporalis fascia microscopic myringoplasty (control group). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary Chinese hospital. METHODS: Data were collected on patients between 2017 and 2019. To balance the baseline characteristics between groups, we performed a propensity score-matched analysis, and 44 patients were included in each group. Hearing improvement and eardrum closure rates were compared, and risk factors affecting them were analyzed. RESULTS: In the control and test groups, 90.90% and 86.36% of patients had a mean air-bone gap ≤20 dB after the surgery, respectively (P = .843). The air conduction (AC) threshold gain at each frequency was similar in the 2 groups (P > .05). The closure rates were 95.45% and 93.18%, respectively (P = .645). The air-bone gap improved significantly after surgery, F(1, 61) = 6.729, P = .012. Age, group, middle ear mucosal status, and location of the perforation did not affect the change in air-bone gap or the drum closure rate (P > .05). However, there was an interaction between the change in air-bone gap and the size of the perforation, F(1, 61) = 11.067, P = 0001. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic myringoplasty using a cartilage-perichondrium complex graft is comparable with traditional surgery. Age, location of the perforation, and middle ear mucosal status did not significantly affect the change in air-bone gap or the drum closure rate. A perforation size ≥50% was always associated with a better air-bone gap improvement.