Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the cost-utility of preferentially administering Heplisav-B vaccine to certain populations.
Rosenthal, Elizabeth M; Hall, Eric W; Rosenberg, Eli S; Harris, Aaron; Nelson, Noele P; Schillie, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Rosenthal EM; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, United States. Electronic address: emrosenthal@albany.edu.
  • Hall EW; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Rosenberg ES; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, United States.
  • Harris A; Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Nelson NP; Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Schillie S; Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Vaccine ; 38(51): 8206-8215, 2020 12 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160756
ABSTRACT
Vaccination is the primary strategy to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the United States. Prior to 2017, most standard hepatitis B vaccine schedules required 3 doses over 6 months. Heplisav-B, approved in 2017, is administered in 2 doses over a 1 month time period but has a higher per-dose cost ($115.75 per dose compared to $57.25 per Engerix-B dose, costs as of June 1, 2019). We aimed to assess the cost-utility of providing the two-dose Heplisav-B vaccine compared to a three-dose Engerix-B vaccine among adult populations currently recommended for vaccination against hepatitis B. We used a decision-tree model with microsimulation and a Markov disease progression process to assess the cost-utility separately for the following populations adults with diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, HIV; non-responders to previous hepatitis B vaccination; older adults; and persons who inject drugs (PWID). We modeled epidemiologic outcomes (incident HBV infections, sequelae and related deaths), costs (2019 USD) and benefits (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) and compared them across strategies. Sensitivity analyses assessed the cost-utility at varying estimates of Heplisav-B efficacy. In the base case scenario for each population, vaccination with Heplisav-B resulted in fewer HBV infections (37.5-59.8% averted), sequelae, and HBV-related deaths (36.3-71.4% averted). Heplisav-B resulted in decreased costs and increased benefits compared to Engerix-B for all populations except non-responders. Incremental costs from the baseline strategy ranged from $4746.78 saved (PWID) to $14.15 added cost (non-responders). Incremental benefits per person ranged from 0.00005 QALYs (older adults) to 0.7 QALYs (PWID). For persons with HIV and PWID, Heplisav-B resulted in lower costs and increased benefits in all scenarios in which Heplisav-B series efficacy was at least 80%. Vaccination using Heplisav-B is a cost-saving strategy compared to Engerix-B for adults with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and HIV; older adults; and PWID.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Usuários de Drogas / Hepatite B Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa / Usuários de Drogas / Hepatite B Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Vaccine Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article