Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differentiation of relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study based on machine learning.
EkSI, Ziya; ÇakiroGlu, Murat; Öz, Cemil; AralaSmak, Ayse; KaradelI, Hasan Hüseyin; Özcan, Muhammed Emin.
Afiliação
  • EkSI Z; Sakarya University, Department of Computer Engineering, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • ÇakiroGlu M; Sakarya University, Department of Mechatronic Engineering, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Öz C; Sakarya University, Department of Computer Engineering, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • AralaSmak A; Memorial Bahçelievler Hospital, Department of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • KaradelI HH; Istanbul Medeniyet University, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Özcan ME; Istanbul Yeni Yüzyil University, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr ; 78(12): 789-796, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331515
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most important tool for diagnosis and follow-up in multiple sclerosis (MS). The discrimination of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) from secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is clinically difficult, and developing the proposal presented in this study would contribute to the process.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to ensure the automatic classification of healthy controls, RRMS, and SPMS by using MR spectroscopy and machine learning methods.

METHODS:

MR spectroscopy (MRS) was performed on a total of 91 participants, distributed into healthy controls (n=30), RRMS (n=36), and SPMS (n=25). Firstly, MRS metabolites were identified using signal processing techniques. Secondly, feature extraction was performed based on MRS Spectra. N-acetylaspartate (NAA) was the most significant metabolite in differentiating MS types. Lastly, binary classifications (healthy controls-RRMS and RRMS-SPMS) were carried out according to features obtained by the Support Vector Machine algorithm.

RESULTS:

RRMS cases were differentiated from healthy controls with 85% accuracy, 90.91% sensitivity, and 77.78% specificity. RRMS and SPMS were classified with 83.33% accuracy, 81.81% sensitivity, and 85.71% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS:

A combined analysis of MRS and computer-aided diagnosis may be useful as a complementary imaging technique to determine MS types.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva / Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Esclerose Múltipla Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arq Neuropsiquiatr Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esclerose Múltipla Crônica Progressiva / Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Esclerose Múltipla Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arq Neuropsiquiatr Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia