Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.
Mühlen, Jan M; Stang, Julie; Lykke Skovgaard, Esben; Judice, Pedro B; Molina-Garcia, Pablo; Johnston, William; Sardinha, Luís B; Ortega, Francisco B; Caulfield, Brian; Bloch, Wilhelm; Cheng, Sulin; Ekelund, Ulf; Brønd, Jan Christian; Grøntved, Anders; Schumann, Moritz.
Afiliação
  • Mühlen JM; Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Stang J; Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lykke Skovgaard E; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, Centre of Research in Childhood Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Judice PB; Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Molina-Garcia P; CIDEFES - Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física e Exercício e Saúde, Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Johnston W; PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health through physical activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Sardinha LB; SFI Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ortega FB; School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Caulfield B; Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada Dafundo, Portugal.
  • Bloch W; PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health through physical activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Cheng S; Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ekelund U; SFI Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Brønd JC; School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Grøntved A; Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Schumann M; Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(14): 767-779, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33397674
Assessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consenso / Lista de Checagem / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Frequência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Consenso / Lista de Checagem / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Frequência Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha