Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial.
Park, Sun-Kyung; Yang, Hyojun; Yoo, Seokha; Kim, Won Ho; Lim, Young-Jin; Bahk, Jae-Hyon; Kim, Jin-Tae.
Afiliação
  • Park SK; From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (SKP, HY, SY, WHK, YJL, JHB, JTK).
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 38(3): 275-284, 2021 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33399385
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position promote the formation of pulmonary atelectasis during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres could reduce peri-operative atelectasis compared with conventional recruitment manoeuvres during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

DESIGN:

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING:

Tertiary hospital, Republic of Korea, from August 2018 to January 2019. PATIENTS Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTION Forty patients were randomised to receive either ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres (manual inflation until no visibly collapsed area was seen with lung ultrasonography; intervention group) or conventional recruitment manoeuvres (single manual inflation with 30 cmH2O pressure; control group). Recruitment manoeuvres were performed 5 min after induction and at the end of surgery in both groups. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The primary outcome was the lung ultrasound score at the end of surgery; a higher score indicates worse lung aeration.

RESULTS:

Lung ultrasound scores at the end of surgery were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with control group (median [IQR], 7.5 [6.5 to 8.5] versus 9.5 [8.5 to 13.5]; difference, -2 [95% CI, -4.5 to -1]; P = 0.008). The intergroup difference persisted in the postanaesthesia care unit (7 [5 to 8.8] versus 10 [7.3 to 12.8]; difference, -3 [95% CI, -5.5 to -1.5]; P = 0.005). The incidence of atelectasis was lower in the intervention group compared with control group at the end of surgery (35 versus 80%; P = 0.010) but was comparable in the postanaesthesia care unit (40 versus 55%; P = 0.527).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres improves peri-operative lung aeration; these effects may persist in the postanaesthesia care unit. However, the long-term effects of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres on clinical outcomes should be the subject of future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03607240).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Anaesthesiol Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Pulmão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Anaesthesiol Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article