Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pilot approach to analyzing patient and citizen involvement in health technology assessment in four diverse low- and middle-income countries.
Holtorf, Anke-Peggy; Mueller, Debjani; Sousa, M Sharmila A; Pretorius, Lauren; Wijaya, Kalman Emry; Adeyemi, Sylvester; Ankleshwaria, Dipen.
Afiliação
  • Holtorf AP; Health Outcomes Strategies GmbH, Colmarerstrasse 58, Basel4055, Switzerland.
  • Mueller D; Charlotte Maxeke Medical Research Cluster (CMeRC), Wits Health Consortium, 31 Princess of Wales Terrace, Park Town, Johannesburg2193, South Africa.
  • Sousa MSA; School of Governance in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
  • Pretorius L; Campaigning for Cancer NPC, 44 Forbes Street, Fellside, Johannesburg, 2192, South Africa.
  • Wijaya KE; Kellogg College, University of Oxford, 60-62 Banbury Road, OxfordOX2 6PN, UK.
  • Adeyemi S; Ducit Blue Solutions, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Ankleshwaria D; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Limitless Building, Jumeirah Village Triangle, Al Khail Road, Dubai, UAE.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e1, 2021 Jan 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491616
BACKGROUND: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) striving to achieve universal health coverage, the involvement of different stakeholders in formal or informal ways in health technology assessment (HTA) must be culturally and socially relevant and acceptable. Challenges may be different from those seen in high-income countries. In this article, we aimed to pilot a questionnaire for uncovering the context-related aspects of patient and citizen involvement (PCI) in LMICs, collecting experiences encountered with PCI, and identifying opportunities for patients and citizens toward contributing to local decision- and policy-making processes related to health technologies. METHODS: Through a collaborative, international multi-stakeholder initiative, a questionnaire was developed for describing each LMIC's healthcare system context and the emergence of opportunities for PCI relating to HTA. The questionnaire was piloted in the first set of countries (Brazil, Indonesia, Nigeria, and South Africa). RESULTS: The questionnaire was successfully applied across four diverse LMICs, which are at different stages of using HTA to inform decision making. Only in Brazil, formal ways of PCI have been defined. In the other countries, there is informal influence that is contingent upon the engagement level of patient and citizen advocacy groups (PCAGs), usually strongest in areas such as HIV/AIDS, TB, oncology, or rare diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire can be used to analyze the options for patients and citizens to participate in HTA or healthcare decision making. It will be rolled out to more LMICs to describe the requirements and opportunities for PCI in the context of LMICs and to identify possible routes and methodologies for devising a more systematic and formalized PCI in LMICs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Países em Desenvolvimento Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica / Países em Desenvolvimento Tipo de estudo: Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça