Periodontal therapy and treatment of hypertension-alternative to the pharmacological approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

AIM: Quantitative comparison of the effects of intensive (IPT) or conventional (CPT) periodontal treatment on arterial blood pressure, endothelial function and inflammatory/metabolic biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) of IPT (supra and subgingival instrumentation). Eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Difference in change of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) before and after IPT or CPT were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included endothelial function and selected inflammatory/anti-inflammatory (CRP, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ) and metabolic biomarkers (HDL, LDL, TGs). RESULTS: The overall effect estimates (pooled Weighted Mean Difference (WMD)) of the primary outcome for SBP and DBP was -4.3 mmHg [95%CI -9.10-0.48], p = 0.08 and -3.16 mmHg [95%CI -6.51-0.19], p = 0.06 respectively. These studies were characterized by high heterogeneity. Therefore, random effects model for meta-analysis was performed. Sub-group analyses confirmed statistically significant reduction in SBP [WMD = -11.41 mmHg (95%CI -13.66, -9.15) P < 0.00001] and DBP [WMD = -8.43 mmHg (95%CI -10.96,-5.91)P < 0.00001] after IPT vs CPT among prehypertensive/hypertensive patients, while this was not observed in normotensive individuals. The meta-analyses showed significant reductions in CRP and improvement of endothelial function following IPT at all analysed timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: IPT leads to improvement of the cardiovascular health in hypertensive and prehypertensive individuals.