Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First Pass Recanalization Rates of Solitaire vs Trevo vs Primary Aspiration: The Kaiser Southern California Experience.
Liang, Conrad W; Toor, Harjyot J; Duran Martinez, Evelin; Sheth, Sunil A; Chao, Kuo; Feng, Lei; Noufal, Mazen; Nguyen, Binh V; Mowji, Pankaj J; Sangha, Navdeep.
Afiliação
  • Liang CW; Department of Neurosurgery, Fontana Medical Center, Fontana, CA.
  • Toor HJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Fontana Medical Center, Fontana, CA.
  • Duran Martinez E; Neurosurgery Residency Program, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA.
  • Sheth SA; Pomona College, Claremont, CA.
  • Chao K; Department of Neurology, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
  • Feng L; Department of Radiology, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Noufal M; Department of Radiology, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Nguyen BV; Department of Neurosurgery, Fontana Medical Center, Fontana, CA.
  • Mowji PJ; Department of Radiology, Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA.
  • Sangha N; Department of Radiology, Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA.
Perm J ; 25: 1-3, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33635754
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT New stroke thrombectomy devices have significantly improved recanalization rates in patients with large vessel occlusion. The first pass effect, or complete or near complete recanalization after a single pass of a device, is associated with better outcome. However, it remains unclear whether one technique is superior to the others at first pass recanalization.

OBJECTIVE:

The successful recanalization rates of three common techniques 1) Stent-retriever with the Solitaire or 2) Trevo device, or 3) primary aspiration (PA) with a distal aspiration catheter, were compared across three Kaiser Permanente Southern California Medical Centers over a 5-year period.

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of cases between October 2013 and May 2018. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Successful recanalization after a single pass of a device.

RESULTS:

Forty-five percent of Solitaire thrombectomies resulted in first pass success, compared with 31% of Trevo and 39% of PA, not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Adjusted for age, gender, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, the odds of successful recanalization were 1.90 ± 0.72 (CI 0.90-3.99, p = 0.09) for Solitaire compared with Trevo, and 1.41 ± 0.50 (CI 0.70-2.84, p = 0.33) for aspiration compared with Trevo.

CONCLUSION:

In this multi-center cohort, there was no statistical difference in successful first pass recanalization between Solitaire, Trevo, and PA. However, there was a trend towards improved efficacy with the Solitaire device compared to Trevo (OR 1.90, p = 0.09). Additional data are needed to determine the conditions under which design differences may favor one technique over another.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Isquemia Encefálica / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perm J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Isquemia Encefálica / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perm J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá