Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dermatologic infections in cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.
Do, Mytrang H; Barrios, Dulce M; Phillips, Gregory S; Postow, Michael A; Warner, Allison Betof; Rosenberg, Jonathan E; Noor, Sarah J; Markova, Alina; Lacouture, Mario E.
Afiliação
  • Do MH; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Barrios DM; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Phillips GS; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Postow MA; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Warner AB; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Rosenberg JE; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Noor SJ; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Markova A; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Lacouture ME; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: lacoutum@mskcc.org.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(6): 1528-1536, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744355
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of dermatologic infections in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has not been systematically described.

OBJECTIVE:

Identify the incidence of dermatologic infections in patients who received CPIs.

METHODS:

Retrospective review of dermatologic infections in patients who received CPIs between 2005 and 2020 and were evaluated by dermatologists at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

RESULTS:

Of 2061 patients in the study, 1292 were actively receiving CPIs (≤ 90 days since the last dose) and 769 had previously been on CPIs (> 90 days since the last dose). The dermatologic infection rate was significantly higher in patients with active CPI treatment (17.5%) than in patients not actively being treated (8.2%; P < .0001). In patients on CPIs, 82 (36.2%), 78 (34.5%), and 48 (21.2%) had bacterial, fungal, and viral infections, respectively, and 18 (8.0%) had polymicrobial infections. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monotherapy was associated with the highest risk of infection (hazard ratio, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.87 to 4.60; P < .001).

LIMITATIONS:

Retrospective design and sample limited to patients referred to dermatology.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients actively receiving CPIs are more susceptible to dermatologic infections, with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 monotherapy carrying the highest risk, suggesting that the index of suspicion for infections should be increased in these patients to minimize morbidity and optimize care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article