Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Population exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety analyses for rucaparib in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma from Study 10 and ARIEL2.
Konecny, Gottfried E; Oza, Amit M; Tinker, Anna V; Oaknin, Ana; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie; Ray-Coquard, Isabelle; Aghajanian, Carol; Coleman, Robert L; O'Malley, David M; Leary, Alexandra; Chen, Lee-May; Provencher, Diane; Ma, Ling; Brenton, James D; Castro, Cesar; Green, Michelle; Simmons, Andrew D; Beltman, Jeri; Harding, Thomas; Lin, Kevin K; Goble, Sandra; Maloney, Lara; Kristeleit, Rebecca S; McNeish, Iain A; Swisher, Elizabeth M; Xiao, Jim J.
Afiliação
  • Konecny GE; Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: GKonecny@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Oza AM; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Tinker AV; Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Oaknin A; Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Shapira-Frommer R; Department of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
  • Ray-Coquard I; Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Lyon, France.
  • Aghajanian C; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Coleman RL; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • O'Malley DM; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Leary A; Gynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, GINECO, Villejuif, France.
  • Chen LM; Gynecologic Oncology Division, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Provencher D; Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Ma L; Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Lakewood, CO, USA.
  • Brenton JD; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Castro C; Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Green M; Integrated Drug Development, Certara Strategic Consulting, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
  • Simmons AD; Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Beltman J; Regulatory Affairs, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Harding T; Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Lin KK; Molecular Diagnostics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Goble S; Biostatistics, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Maloney L; Clinical Development, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Kristeleit RS; Department of Oncology, University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute, UCL Hospitals, London, UK.
  • McNeish IA; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Swisher EM; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Xiao JJ; Clinical Pharmacology, Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 161(3): 668-675, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33752918
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate correlations between rucaparib exposure and selected efficacy and safety endpoints in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma using pooled data from Study 10 and ARIEL2.

METHODS:

Efficacy analyses were limited to patients with carcinomas harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who had received ≥2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received ≥1 rucaparib dose. Steady-state daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUCss) and maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) for rucaparib were calculated for each patient and averaged by actual dose received over time (AUCavg,ss and Cmax,avg,ss) using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model.

RESULTS:

Rucaparib exposure was dose-proportional and not associated with baseline patient weight. In the exposure-efficacy analyses (n = 121), AUCavg,ss was positively associated with independent radiology review-assessed RECIST response in the subgroup of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (n = 75, p = 0.017). In the exposure-safety analyses (n = 393, 40 mg once daily to 840 mg twice daily [BID] starting doses), most patients received a 600 mg BID rucaparib starting dose, with 27% and 21% receiving 1 or ≥2 dose reductions, respectively. Cmax,ss was significantly correlated with grade ≥2 serum creatinine increase, grade ≥3 alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase increase, platelet decrease, fatigue/asthenia, and maximal hemoglobin decrease (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The exposure-response analyses provide support for the approved starting dose of rucaparib 600 mg BID for maximum clinical benefit with subsequent dose modification only following the occurrence of a treatment-emergent adverse event in patients with BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário / Indóis / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário / Indóis / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article