Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preparing students for residency interviews in the age of COVID: Lessons learned from a standardized video interview preparation program.
Leung, Cynthia G; Malone, Matthew; Way, David P; Barrie, Michael G; Kman, Nicholas E; San Miguel, Christopher.
Afiliação
  • Leung CG; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
  • Malone M; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
  • Way DP; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
  • Barrie MG; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
  • Kman NE; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
  • San Miguel C; Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
AEM Educ Train ; 5(3): e10583, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33821226
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the widescale adoption of video-based interviewing for residency applications. Video interviews have previously been used in the residency application process through the pilot program of the American Association of Medical Colleges standardized video interview (SVI). We conducted an SVI preparation program with our students over 3 years that consisted of an instructional lecture, deliberate practice in video interviewing, and targeted feedback by emergency medicine faculty. The aim of this investigation was to summarize the feedback students received on their practice SVIs to provide the guidance they need for preparing for the video interviews that will replace in-person interviews with residency programs.

Methods:

A retrospective thematic analysis was conducted on faculty feedback provided to students who had completed SVI practice videos in preparation for their application to an EM residency between June 2017 and July 2019. Categorized comments were also sorted by type of faculty feedback positive reinforcement, constructive criticism, or both.

Results:

Forty-six medical students received 334 feedback elements from three faculty. Feedback was balanced between positive reinforcement statements and constructive criticism. Students performed well on appearance and attire, creating a proper recording environment, and response content. They needed the most guidance with the delivery of content and the technical quality of the video.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrate a need for formal instruction in how to communicate effectively through the video medium. Medical educators will need to formally prepare students for tele-interviews with residency programs, with an emphasis on communication skills and techniques for improving the quality of their video presentation, including lighting and camera placement.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: AEM Educ Train Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: AEM Educ Train Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article